I have just newly discovered William Gibson's blog, but damn it is the best thing I have found in a long time. Maybe I will finally pick up _Neuromancer_ and give it a read, but in the meantime, he has been added to my must read list. Here is just a little snippet from today which struck my fancy:
William Gibson: "In very much the sense that Bush is not actually a Christian, likewise is he nothing remotely conservative. Believing Bush is conservative in any traditional sense is like believing that a Formula One racer with the Perrier logo on its side is full of mineral water.
The RNC today is a party in the hands of dangerous political radicals. "
Amen. To be perfectly honest, I am not terribly devoted to either party outright. If I thought a sensible Republican were running, I would vote for him. In the last election, I would have voted for McCain over Gore in a heartbeat (I have more circumspect feelings about mccain these days considering the way he has been whoring himself out as bush's do-boy as of late, but that is another story). I am not completely opposed to conservative tendencies and when they are genuine and tempered with a sincere concern for others, I deeply respect them. In many ways I tend towards conservative. In others, of course, I tend towards radical, but point is it is not the label 'conservative' or 'liberal' that rallies me behind a politician or a cause.
But calling bush a conservative or a christian is at dramatic odds with his actions as president. He make get his backing from people who call themselves both, but he acts like neither.
Thursday, October 21, 2004
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
earl,
hey sweet peaches. I think that this link to a recent Alternet article will tickle yer ole' fancy a bit. If not, i have other ideas:}
yours,
AVGVSTVS MAXIMVS
the link would pro'ly be good, eh? sorry
http://www.alternet.org/story/22294/
hugs and more hugs
Le Bourgeois Otter
Post a Comment